Looking for:
Spc aiag manual free download |
Aiag SPC Manual 3rd Edition PDF | PDF | Portable Document Format | Iso . Spc aiag manual free download
Spc aiag manual free download - Recommended
(SPC) Statistical Process Control | AIAG
The objective is to stabilize the process. A stable, predictable process is said to be in statistical control. The second phase is concerned with predicting future measurements thus verifying ongoing process stability. During this phase, data analysis and reaction to special causes is done in real time.
Once stable, the process can be analyzed to determine if it is capable of producing what the customer desires. Identify the centerline and control limits of the control chart To assist in the graphical analysis of the plotted control statistics, draw lines to indicate the location estimate centerline and control limits of the control statistic on the chart. See Chapter 11, Section C, for the formulas.
Special causes can affect either the process location e. The objective of control chart analysis is to identify any evidence that the process variability or the process location is not operating at a constant level - that one or both ai-e out of statistical control - and to take appropriate action. In the subsequent discussion, the Average will be used for the location control statistic and the Range for the variation control statistic.
The conclusions stated for these control statistics also apply equally to the other possible control statistics. Since the control limits of the location statistic are dependent on the variation statistic, the variation control statistic should be analyzed first for stability. The variation and location statistics are analyzed separately, but comparison of patterns between the two charts may sometimes give added insight into special causes affecting the process A process cannot be said to be stable in statistical control unless both charts have no out-of-control conditions indications of special causes.
Analyze the Data Since the ability to interpret either the subgroup ranges or subgroup averages depends' on the estimate of piece-to-piece variability, the R chart is analyzed first. The data points are compared with the control limits, for points out of control or for unusual patterns or trends see Chapter 11, Section D ecial Causes Range For each indication of a special cause in the range chart data, conduct an analysis of the process operation to deternine the cause and improve process understanding; correct that condition, and prevent it from recurring.
The control chart itself should be a useful guide in problem analysis, suggesting when the condition may have began and how long it continued. However, recognize that not all special causes are negative; some special causes can result in positive process improvement in terms of decreased variation in the range - those special causes should be assessed for possible institutionalization within the process, where appropriate.
Timeliness is important in problem analysis, both in terms of minimizing the production of inconsistent output, and in terms of having fresh evidence for diagnosis. It should be emphasized that problem solving is often the most difficult and time-consuming step.
Statistical input from the control chart can be an appropriate starting point, but other methods such as Pareto charts, cause and effect diagrams, or other graphical analysis can be helpful see Ishikawa Ultimately, however, the explanations for behavior lie within the process and the people who are involved with it.
Thoroughness, patience, insight and understanding will be required to develop actions that will measurably improve performance. CHAPTER I1 - Section A Control Charting Process Recalculate Control Limits Range Chart When conducting an initial process study or a reassessment of process capability, the control limits should be recalculated to exclude the effects of out-of-control periods for which process causes have been clearly identified and removed or institutionalized.
Exclude all subgroups affected by the special causes that have been identified and removed or institutionalized, then recalculate and plot the new average range and control limits. Confirm that all range points show control when compared to the new limits; if not, repeat the identification, correction, recalculation sequence.
If any subgroups were dropped from the R chart because of identified special causes, they should also be excluded from the chart. NOTE: The exclusion of subgroups representing unstable conditions is not just "throwing away bad data. This, in turn, gives the most appropriate basis for the control limits to detect future occurrences of special causes of variation. Be reminded, however, that the process must be changed so the special cause will not recur if undesirable as part of the process.
Find and Address Special Causes Average Chart Once the special cause which affect the variation Range Chart have been identified and their effect have been removed, the Average Chart can be evaluated for special causes. In Figure For each indication of an out-of-control condition in the average chart data, conduct an analysis of the process operation to determine the reason for the special cause; correct that condition, and prevent it from recurring.
Use the chart data as a guide to when such conditions began and how long they continued. Timeliness in analysis is important, both for diagnosis and to minimize inconsistent output. Problem solving techniques such as Pareto analysis and cause-and-effect analysis can help. Ishikawa Recalculate Control Limits Average Chart When conducting an initial process study or a reassessment of process capability, exclude any out-of-control points for which special causes have been found and removed; recalculate and plot the process average and control limits.
The preceding discussions were intended to give a functional introduction to control chart analysis. Even though these discussions used the Average and Range Charts, the concepts apply to all control chart approaches. Furthermore, there are other considerations that can be useful to the analyst. One of the most important is the reminder that, even with processes that are in statistical control, the probability of getting a false signal of a special cause on any individual subgroup increases as more data are reviewed.
While it is wise to investigate all signals as possible evidence of special causes, it should be recognized that they may have been caused by the system and that there may be no underlying local process problem. If no clear evidence of a special cause is found, any "corrective" action will probably serve to increase, rather than decrease, the total variability in the process output. It might be desirable here to adjust the process to the target if the process center is off target.
These limits would be used for ongoing monitoring of the process, with the operator and local supervision responding to signs of out-of-control conditions on either the location and variation X or R chart with prompt action see Figure A change in the subgroup sample size would affect the expected average range and the control limits for both ranges and averages.
This situation could occur, for instance, if it were decided to take smaller samples more frequently, so as to detect large process shifts more quickly without increasing the total number of pieces sampled per day. As long as the process remains in control for both averages and ranges, the ongoing limits can be extended for additional periods.
If, however, there is evidence that the process average or range has changed in either direction , the cause should be determined and, if the change is justifiable, control limits should be recalculated based on current performance. The goal of the process control charts is not perfection, but a reasonable and economical state of control. For practical purposes, therefore, a coiltrolled process is not one where the chart never goes out of control.
Obviously, there are different levels or degrees of statistical control. The definition of control used can range from mere outliers beyond the control limits , through runs, trends and stratification, to fidl zone analysis. As the definition of control used advances to fill1 zone analysis, the liltelihood of finding lack of control increases for example, a process with no outliers may demonstrate lack of control though an obvious run still within the control limits.
For this reason, the definition of control used should be consistent with your ability to detect this at the point of control and should remain the same within one time period, within one process. Some suppliers may not be able to apply the hller definitions of conti on the floor on a real-time basis due to immature stages of operator training or lack of sophistication in the operator's ability.
The ability to detect lack of control at the point of control on a real-time basis is an advantage of the control chart. Over-intespretation of the data can be a danger in maintaining a true state of economical control.
The presence of one or more points beyond either control limit is primary evidence of special cause variation at that point. This special cause could have occurred prior to this point. Since points beyond the control limits would be rare if only variation from comrnon causes were present, the presumption is that a special cause has accounted for the extreme value. Therefore, any point beyond a control limit is a signal for analysis of the operation for the special cause.
Mark any data points that are beyond the control limits for investigation and corrective action based on when that special cause actually started. A point outside a control limit is generally a sign of one or more of the following: The control limit or plot point has been miscalculated or misplotted. The piece-to-piece variability or the spread of the distribution has increased i. The measurement system has changed e.
For charts dealing with the spread, a point below the lower control limit is generally a sign of one or more of the following: The control limit or plot point is in error. The spread of the distribution has decreased i.
A point beyond either control limit is generally a sign that the process has shifted either at that one point or as part of a trend see Figure When the ranges are in statistical control, the process spread - the within-subgroup variation - is considered to be stable.
The averages can then be analyzed to see if the process location is changing over time. If the averages are not in control, some special causes of variation are malting the process location unstable. This could give the first warning of an unfavorable condition which should be corrected. Conversely, certain patterns or trends could be favorable and should be studied for possible permanent improvement of the process.
Comparison of patterns between the range and average charts may give added insight. There are situations where an "out-of-control pattern" may be a bad event for one process and a good event for another process. An example of this is that in an X and R chart a series of 7 or more points on one side of the centerline may indicate an out-of-control situation.
If this happened in a p chart, the process may actually be improving if the series is below the average line less nonconformances are being produced. So in this case the series is a good thing - if we identify and retain the cause. Mark the point that prompts the decision; it may be helpful to extend a reference line back to the beginning of the run.
Analysis should consider the approximate time at which it appears that the trend or shift first began. J A change in the measurement system e. J A change in the measurement system, which could mask real performance changes.
OTE: As the subgroup size n becomes smaller 5 or less , the likelihood of runs below R increases, so a run length of 8 or more could be necessary to signal a decrease in process variability. A run relative to the process average is generally a sign of one or both of the following: J The process average has changed - and may still be changing.
J The measurement system has changed drift, bias, sensitivity, etc. Care should be taken not to over-interpret the data, since even random i. Examples of nom-andom patterns could be obvious trends even though they did not satisfy the runs tests , cycles, the overall spread of data points within the control limits, or even relationships among values within subgroups e.
One test for the overall spread of subgroup data points is described below. If several process streams are present, they should be identified and tracked separately see also Appendix A. Figure The most commonly used are discussed above. Determination of which of the additional criteria to use depends on the specific process characteristics and special causes which are dominant within the process. Note 2: Care should be given not to apply multiple criteria except in those cases where it makes sense.
The application of each additional criterion increases the sensitivity of finding a special cause but also increases the chance of a Type I error. In reviewing the above, it should be noted that not all these considerations for interpretation of control can be applied on the production floor. There is simply too much for the appraiser to remember and utilizing the advantages of a computer is often not feasible on the production floor. So, much of this more detailed analysis may need to be done offline rather than in real time.
This supports the need for the process event log and for appropriate thoughtfill analysis to be done after the fact. Another consideration is in the training of operators. Application of the additional control criteria should be used on the production floor when applicable, but not until the operator is ready for it; both with the appropriate training and tools.
With time and experience the operator will recognize these patterns in real time. The Average Run Length is the number of sample subgroups expected between out-of-control signals. The in-control Average Run Length A X , is the expected number of subgroup samples between false alai-ins. The ARL is dependent on how out-of-control signals are defined, the true target value's deviation from the estimate, and the tme variation relative to the estimate.
This table indicates that a mean shift of 1. A shift of 4 standard deviations would be identified within 2 subgroups. Larger-subgroups reduce the size of o, and tighten the control limits around X. Alternatively, the ARL ' s can be reduced by adding more out-of-control criteria. Other signals such as runs tests and patterns analysis along with the control limits will reduce the size of the ARL ' s. The following table is approximate ARL's for the same chart adding - the runs test of 7-points in a row one side o f 2.
As can be seen, adding the one extra out-of-control criterion significantly reduces the ARLs for small shifts in the mean, a decrease in the risk of a Type I1 error. Note that the zero-shift the in-control ARL is also reduced significantly. This is an increase in the risk of a Type I error or false alarm. This balance between wanting a long ARL when the process is in control versus a short ARL when there is a process change has led to the development of other charting methods. Some of those methods are briefly described in Chapter There are other approaches in the literature which do not use averages.
Therefore, valid signals occur only in the ; form of points beyond the control limits. Other rules used to evaluate the j data for non-random patterns see Chapter II, Section B are not reliable indicators of out-of-control conditions.
These control charts use categorical data and the probabilities related to the categories to identify the presences of special causes. The analysis of categorical data by these charts generally utilizes the binomial, or poisson distribution approximated by the normal form. Traditionally attributes charts are used to track unacceptable parts by identifying nonconfoi-ming items and nonconforrnities within an item.
There is nothing intrinsic in attributes charts that restricts them to be solely used in charting nonconforming items. They can also be used for tracking positive events.
However, we will follow tradition and refer to these as nonconformances and nonconformities. Guideline: Since the control limits are based on a normal approximation, the sample size used should be such that np 2 5. Most of these charts were developed to address specific process situations or conditions which can affect the optimal use of the standard control charts. A brief description of the more common charts will follow below.
This description will define the charts, discuss when they should be used and list the formulas associated with the chart, as appropriate. If more information is desired regarding these charts or others, please consult a reference text that deals specifically with these types of control charts. Probability based charts belong to a class of control charts that uses categorical data and the probabilities related to the categories.
The analysis of categorical data generally uses the binomial, multinomial or poisson distribution. Examples of these charts are the attributes charts discussed in Chapter I1 Section C.
However, there is nothing inherent in any of these forms or any other forms that requires one or more categories to be "bad. This is as much the fault of professionals and teachers, as it is the student's.
There is a tendency to take the easy way out, using traditional and stereotypical examples. This leads to a failure to realize that quality practitioners once had or were constrained to the tolerance philosophy; i. The Average Run Length is the number of sample subgroups expected between out-of-control signals. The ARL is dependent on how out-of-control signals are defined, the true target value's deviation from the estimate, and the true variation relative to the estimate.
Below is a table of approximate ARL's for the standard Shewhart control chart with exceeding the control limits as the only out-of-control signal. ARL 0 A shift of 4 standard deviations would be identified within 2 subgroups. Since , the practical magnitude of the shifts can be reduced by increasing the number of items in each subgroup.
Larger subgroups reduce the size of and tighten the control limits around. Alternatively, the ARL's can be reduced by adding more out-ofcontrol criteria.
Other signals such as runs tests and patterns analysis along with the control limits will reduce the size of the A R L ' s. The following table is approximate ARL 's for the same chart adding the runs test of 7-points in a row on one side of. Shift in Target ARL 0 Note that the zero-shift the in-control ARL is also reduced significantly. This is an increase in the risk of a Type I error or false alarm. This balance between wanting a long ARL when the process is in control versus a short ARL when there is a process change has led to the development of other charting methods.
Some of those methods are briefly described in Chapter III. There are other approaches in the literature which do not use averages. Therefore, valid signals occur only in the form of points beyond the control limits.
Other rules used to evaluate the data for non-random patterns see Chapter II, Section B are not reliable indicators of out-of-control conditions. These control charts use categorical data and the probabilities related to the categories to identify the presences of special causes.
The analysis of categorical data by these charts generally utilizes the binomial, or poisson distribution approximated by the normal form. Traditionally attributes charts are used to track unacceptable parts by identifying nonconforming items and nonconformities within an item.
There is nothing intrinsic in attributes charts that restricts them to be solely used in charting nonconforming items. They can also be used for tracking positive events. However, we will follow tradition and refer to these as nonconformances and nonconformities. Most of these charts were developed to address specific process situations or conditions which can affect the optimal use of the standard control charts.
A brief description of the more common charts will follow below. This description will define the charts, discuss when they should be used and list the formulas associated with the chart, as appropriate.
If more information is desired regarding these charts or others, please consult a reference text that deals specifically with these types of control charts. Probability Based Charts Probability based charts belong to a class of control charts that uses categorical data and the probabilities related to the categories.
The analysis of categorical data generally uses the binomial, multinomial or poisson distribution. The attributes charts use the categories of "good" and "bad" e. However, there is nothing inherent in any of these forms or any other forms that requires one or more categories to be "bad. This is as much the fault of professionals and teachers, as it is the student's.
There is a tendency to take the easy way out, using traditional and stereotypical examples. This leads to a failure to realize that quality practitioners once had or were constrained to the tolerance philosophy; i. Stoplight Control With stoplight control charts, the process location and variation are controlled using one chart.
The chart tracks the number of data points in the sample in each of the designated categories. The decision criteria are based on the expected probabilities for these categories.
A typical scenario will divide the process variation into three parts: warning low, target, warning high. The areas outside the expected process variation 6 are the stop zones. One simple but effective control procedure of this type is stoplight control which is a semivariables more than two categories technique using double sampling.
In this approach the target area is designated green, the warning areas as yellow, and the stop zones as red. The use of these colors gives rise to the "stoplight" designation. Of course, this allows process control only if the process distribution is known. The quantification and analysis of the process requires variables data.
The focus of this tool is to detect changes special causes of variation in the process. That is, this is an appropriate tool for stage 2 activities 27 only. At its basic implementation, stoplight control requires no computations and no plotting, thereby making it easier to implement than control charts.
Since it splits the total sample e. Although, the development of this technique is thoroughly founded in statistical theory, it can be implemented and taught at the operator level without involving mathematics.
Any area outside the process distribution the If the process distribution follows the normal form, approximately Similar conditions can be established if the distribution is found to be non-normal. For control equivalent to an and R chart with a sample size of 5, the steps for stoplight control can be outlined as follows: 1. Check 2 pieces; if both pieces are in the green area, continue to run.
If one or both are in the red zone, stop the process, notify the designated person for corrective action and sort material. When setup or other corrections are made, repeat step 1.
If one or both are in a yellow zone, check three more pieces. If any pieces fall in a red zone, stop the process, notify the designated person for corrective action and sort material.
Measurements can be made with variables as well as attributes gaging. Certain variables gaging such as dial indicators or airelectronic columns are better suited for this type of program since the indicator background can be color coded.
Although no charts or graphs are required, charting is recommended, especially if subtle trends shifts over a relatively long period of time are possible in the process. In any decision-making situation there is a risk of making a wrong decision. Sensitivity refers to the ability of the sampling plan to detect out-of-control conditions due to increased variation or shifts from the process average. The disadvantage of stoplight control is that it has a higher false alarm rate than an and R chart of the same total sample size.
The advantage of stoplight control is that it is as sensitive as an and R chart of the same total sample size. Users tend to accept control mechanisms based on these types of data due to the ease of data collection and analysis. Focus is on the target not specification limits — thus it is compatible with the target philosophy and continuous improvement.
Pre-Control An application of the stoplight control approach for the purpose of nonconformance control instead o f process control is called Precontrol. It is based on the specifications not the process variation. The first assumption means that all special sources of variation in the process are being controlled.
The second assumption states that The area outside the specifications is labeled red. For a process that is normal with Cp , Cpk equal to 1. Similar calculations could be done if the distribution was found to be non-normal or highly capable. The pre-control sampling uses a sample size of two. However, before the sampling can start, the process must produce 5 consecutive parts in the green zone. Each of the two data points are plotted on the chart and reviewed against a set of rules.
Every time the process is adjusted, before the sampling can start the process must produce 5 consecutive parts in the green zone. Pre-control is not a process control chart but a nonconformance control chart so great care must be taken as to how this chart is used and interpreted. Pre-control charts should be not used when you have a Cp, Cpk greater than one or a loss function that is not flat within the specifications see Chapter IV. The disadvantage of precontrol is that potential diagnostics that are available with normal process control methods are not available.
Further, pre-control does not evaluate nor monitor process stability. Pre-control is a compliance based tool not a process control tool. However there are processes that only produce a small number of products during a single run e. Further, the increasing focus on just-in-time JIT inventory and lean manufacturing methods is driving production runs to become shorter.
From a business perspective, producing large batches of product several times per month and holding it in inventory for later distribution, can lead to avoidable, unnecessary costs. Manufacturers now are moving toward JIT — producing much smaller quantities on a more frequent basis to avoid the costs of holding "work in process" and inventory.
For example, in the past, it may have been satisfactory to make 10, parts per month in batches of 2, per week. Now, customer demand, flexible manufacturing methods and JIT requirements might lead to making and shipping only parts per day.
To realize the efficiencies of short-run processes it is essential that SPC methods be able to verify that the process is truly in statistical control, i. The process must be operated in a stable and consistent manner. The process aim must be set and maintained at the proper level. The Natural Process Limits must fall within the specification limits. Short-run oriented charts allow a single chart to be used for the control of multiple products.
Is this content inappropriate? Report this Document. Description: Spc manual short. Flag for inappropriate content. Download now. Jump to Page. Search inside document. DIN That is, some special causes may change the process without destroying its symmetry or unimodality. Also a non-normal distribution may have no special causes acting upon it but its distributional form is non-symmetric.
Time-based statistical and probabilistic methods do provide necessary and sufficient methods of determining if special causes exist. Although several classes of methods are useful in this task, the most versatile and robust is the genre of control charts which were first developed and implemented by Dr. Walter Shewhart of the Bell Laboratories 9 while studying process data in the 's.
He first made the distinction between controlled and uncontrolled variation due to what is called common and special causes. He developed a simple but powerful tool to separate the two the control chart. Since that time, control charts have been used successfully in a wide variety of process control and improvement situations. Experience has shown that control charts effectively direct attention toward special causes of variation when they occur and reflect the extent of common cause variation that must be reduced by system or process improvement.
It is impossible to reduce the above mistakes to zero. Shewhart realized this and developed a graphical approach to minimize, over the long run, the economic loss from both mistakes. The exact level of belief in prediction of future actions cannot be determined by statistical measures alone. Subject-matter expertise is required. If process control activities assure that no special cause sources of variation are active 10, the process is said to be in statistical control or "in control.
The active existence of any special cause will render the process out of statistical control or "out of control. When Shewhart developed control charts he was concerned with the economic control of processes; i. To do this, sample statistics are compared to control limits.
But how are these limits determined? Consider a process distribution that can be described by the normal form. The goal is to determine when special causes are affecting it. Another way of saying this is, "Has the process changed since it was last looked at it or during the period sampled? Shewhart's Two Rules for the Presentation of Data: Data should always be presented in such a way that preserves the evidence in the data for all the predictions that might be made from these data.
Whenever an average, range, or histogram is used to summarize data, the summary should not mislead the user into taking any action that the user would not take if the data were presented in a time series. Since the normal distribution is described by its process location mean and process width range or standard deviation this question becomes: Has the process location or process width changed?
Consider only the location. What approach can be used to determine if the process location has changed? One possibility would be to look. The alternative is to use a sample of the process, and calculate the mean of the sample. If the process has not changed, will the sample mean be equal to the distribution mean? The answer is that this very rarely happens. But how is this possible?
After all, the process has not changed. Doesn't that imply that the process mean remains the same? The reason for this is that the sample mean is only an estimation of the process mean. To make this a little clearer, consider taking a sample of size one.
The mean of the sample is the individual sample itself. With such random samples from the distribution, the readings will eventually cover the entire process range.
Using the formula:. These are called control limits. If the sample falls outside these limits then there is reason to believe that a special cause is present. Further, it is expected that all the random samples will exhibit a random ordering within these limits. If a group of samples shows a pattern there is reason to believe that a special cause is present. Approach: Since Control Charts provide the operational definition of "in statistical control," they are useful tools at every stage of the Improvement Cycle see Chapter I, Section F.
Within each stage, the PDSA 14 cycle should be used. Plot the data: 9 Plot using the time order 9 Compare to control limits and determine if there are any. Analyze the data Take appropriate action The data are compared with the control limits to see whether the variation is stable and appears to come from only common causes.
If special causes of variation are evident, the process is studied to further determine what is affecting it. After actions see Chapter I, Section D have been taken, further data are collected, control limits are recalculated if necessary, and any additional special causes are acted upon. After all special causes have been addressed and the process is running in statistical control, the control chart continues as a monitoring tool.
Process capability can also be calculated. If the variation from common causes is excessive, the process cannot produce output that consistently meets customer requirements. The process itself must be investigated, and, typically, management action must be taken to improve the system. For control Review the data collection scheme before starting: 9 Is the metric appropriate; i.
Often it is found that although the process was aimed at the target value during initial setup, the actual process location 15 may not match this value. For those processes where the actual location deviates from the target and the ability to relocate the process is economical, consideration should be given to adjusting the process so that it is aligned with the target see Chapter IV, Section C. This assumes that this adjustment does not affect the process variation.
This may not always hold true, but the causes for any possible increase in process variation after re-targeting the process should be understood and assessed against both customer satisfaction and economics.
The long-term performance of the process should continue to be analyzed. This can be accomplished by a periodic and systematic review of the ongoing control charts. New evidence of special causes might be revealed. Some special causes, when understood, will be beneficial and useful for process improvement Others will be detrimental, and will need to be corrected or removed. The purpose of the Improvement Cycle is to gain an understanding of the process and its variability to improve its performance.
As this understanding matures, the need for continual monitoring of product variables may become less especially in processes where documented analysis shows that the dominant source of variation are more efficiently and effectively controlled by other approaches. For example: in processes where maintenance is the dominant source of variation, the process is best controlled by preventive and predictive maintenance; for processes where process setup is the dominant source of variation, the process is best controlled by setup control charts.
Successfully reported this slideshow. Your SlideShare is downloading. Spc manual. Ranvijay Akela. Next SlideShares. You are reading a preview. Activate your 30 day free trial to continue reading. Continue for Free. Deming identifies two mistakes frequently made in process control: "Mistake 1. Ascribe a variation or a mistake to a special cause, when in fact the cause belongs to the system common causes.
Mistake 2. Ascribe a variation or a mistake to a system common causes , when in fact the cause was special. Over adjustment [tampering] is a common example of mistake No. Never doing anything to try to find a special cause is a common example of mistake No.
There is a common misconception that histograms can be used for this purpose. Histograms are the graphical representation of the distributional form of the process variation.
The distributional form is studied to verify that the process variation is symmetric and unimodal and that it follows a normal distribution. Unfortunately normality does not guarantee that there are no special causes acting on the process. That is, some special causes may change the process without destroying its symmetry or unimodality. Also a nonnormal distribution may have no special causes acting upon it but its distributional form is non-symmetric. Time-based statistical and probabilistic methods do provide necessary and sufficient methods of determining if special causes exist.
Although several classes of methods are useful in this task, the most versatile and robust is the genre of control charts which were first developed and implemented by Dr. He first made the distinction between controlled and uncontrolled variation due to what is called common and special causes.
He developed a simple but powerful tool to separate the two - the control chart. Since that time, control charts have been used successfully in a wide variety of process control and improvement situations.
Experience has shown that control charts effectively direct attention toward special causes of variation when they occur and reflect the extent of common cause variation that must be reduced by system or process improvement. It is impossible to reduce the above mistakes to zero. Shewhart realized this and developed a graphical approach to minimize, over the long run, the economic loss from both mistakes. Deming and Deming Shewhart 1. The active existence of any special cause will render the process out of statistical control or "out of control.
When Shewhart developed control charts lie was concerned with the economic control of processes; i. To do this, sample statistics are compared to control limits. But how are these limits determined? Consider a process distribution that can be described by the normal form. The goal is to determine when special causes are affecting it. Another way of saying this is, "Has the process changed since it was last looked at it or during the period sampled? Whenever an average, range, or histogram is used to summarize data, the summary should not mislead the user into taking any action that the user would not take if the data were presented in a time series.
Since the normal distribution is described by its process location mean and process width range or standard deviation this question becomes: Has the process location or process width changed? Consider only the location. What approach can be used to determine if the process location has changed? One possibility would be to look at 10 11 This is done by using the process infomation to identify and eliminate the existence of special causes or detecting them and removing their effect when they do occur.
As with all probabilistic methods some risk is involved. The exact level of belief in prediction of future actions cannot be determined by statistical measures alone. Subject-matter expertise is required. The alternative is to use a sample of the process, and calculate the mean of the sample. Has the process changed n. Please fill this form, we will try to respond as soon as possible.
Your name. Close Submit. Please copy and paste this embed script to where you want to embed Embed Script. Size px x x x x We need your help!
The first is identifying and eliminating the special causes of variation in the process. The objective is to stabilize the process. A stable, predictable process is said to be in statistical control.
❿
Comments
Post a Comment